According to Environmental Pillar’s immediate release, the Minister of Housing, TD Eoghan Murphy, is pressing for new planning rules outlined in the “Housing and Planning and Development Bill 2019”. If these rules were to be implemented, it would be even more complicated for citizens or NGOs to bring a case to Court against poor planning decisions. It would lead to a more complex court process, and a rising of the costs of the legal procedure. If implemented, these changes would be in violation of EU law and the UN Aarhus Convention

Ireland’s leading environmental coalition said it  “is shocked at the Minister for Housing’s attempt […] that would make it near impossible to challenge planning decisions in the courts and hold public authorities and the Government to account.”

 

What would change?

The first change would impact procedure costs rules. Now, in compliance with article 9 of the Aarhus Convention, the procedures are required to be “not prohibitively expensive”. The rules make each party bear their own costs, but a successful plaintiff might be granted some extra costs. 

With the new bill, we would head to a cap of 5.000€ for individuals and of 10.000€ for groups. It would also limit the amount awarded to a successful litigant to 40.000€, which would make things harder for NGOs or citizens to seek legal representation as lawyers are often hired on a “no foal, no fee” basis for that kind of cases. Mr Justice Frank Clarke, Chief Justice, has said in the past that the issue of costs has been a “great difficulty” for Ireland to comply with the Aarhus Convention.

The requirements for citizens to be able to bring a planning case to court would be getting stricter. Again, in compliance with article 9 of the Aarhus Convention, any citizens willing to tackle a bad planning decision need to show a “sufficient interest”. With the new Bill, it would depend on a “substantial interest”. The new rules would also require from the individual to be “directly affected, in a way which is peculiar or personal” and to have had “prior participation in planning process”. This would call for a far higher level of justification and the burden of the proof of these requirements would rest upon the individual. 

But under the new rules, the requirements for NGOs would be getting drastic too. From a condition of “12 months previous existence”, NGOs would have to exist for at least 3 years with the new regime. This prerequisite is already stern and rule out most of the recent (environmental) groups, but the bill goes further: NGOs would need a minimum of 100 affiliated members. The local groups that might meet the existence requirement would probably not meet this criteria. I guess it’s always easier to win a legal fight when your competitor cannot even access the battle field. 

 

How would it breach international law?  

This new Bill would be in breach of international law as it would not comply with the Aarhus Convention anymore. Ireland has been really late to comply with it in the first place, and now is about to set backward. The Convention has three clear objectives: ensuring citizens’ rights to access environmental information, to participate in environmental decisions and to timely access justice in environmental matters. How far from reached those objectives would be.

In regards toEU Law, it’s more debatable. The EU Directive 2011/92 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, guarantees access to justice in its 11th article. But this legislation gives member states some discretion power on how to implement access to justice. There’s a lot to bet that this discretion power will be a main – if not the only – argument of Minister Murphy when defending his Bill.

 

Official comment? 

Saying a few words on this morning’s “Today Sean O’Rouke”, Minister Murphy did not mention this Planning Bill. He has yet refused to comment on the breaking news, explained Niall Sargent, Editor of Green News, to us. 

The only explanations we could read so far are those written in an email Murphy has sent to the Oireachtas Committee for Housing, Planning and Local Government. While asking the committee for an “early pre-legislative scrutiny” to achieve an implementation by next Easter, he stated that “there is a need to safeguard the timely delivery of projects and value for public money while simultaneously maintaining the rights of citizens to challenge decisions that do not comply with European environmental law.”

If you’re a curious person, like me, you would try and find the Bill or at least a draft somewhere. Well I tell you; you’ll end up disappointed. Nor on the Ministry’s website, nor on the Oireachtas Committee tab, nowhere will you find something about this new Bill. “It’s difficult to be aware of this Bill if you have no links with the Committee” admitted Niall Sargent. The Environmental Pillar itself only saw the Heads of the Bill. “We need a more proactive information with the public.”

 

Any other comments?

Tony Lowes from Friends of Ireland explained this morning to Pat Kenny that “it’s a draconian Bill that is bad for environmental NGOs and community groups. Everything about it is regressive and it sets the clock back on access to justice rights.” Accordingly, Orla Hegarty explained that “the planning system is moving further away from being a citizen-friendly system, and back to being centralized.” According to her, instead of trying to poorly address the “court problem”, the Government should deal with the root of the problem and allow groups and citizens to raise their concerns earlier in the decision process.

The least we can say is that this new Bill has made voices rise all over the country. Various organisations have emphasised how this would be in violation of their rights to access justice. Several legal professionals also expressed how outrageous this new legislation is. “The reactions on social media are strong” said Niall Sargent. “Groups are really shocked.” Altogether, they will now try to raise awareness, especially – but not only – in the activist community. So, if you want to support the Environmental Pillar and other groups, a first step can be to talk about it and maybe even share this article.

 

Photo by Juan J. Martinez on Flickr

 

Browse more stories below or sign up to our newsletter to receive our top news straight to your inbox!

Greenwashing Austerity: What Do Young Greens Feel About the New Government?

The General Election of February 2020 feels like a world away now. Not only do the pre-social distancing days seem like a weird alternative universe, but also the hopes for radical change which many, particularly young, people dared to hold as they headed to the ballot box are starting to seem like a crazy dream. As the coalition of Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and the Green Party settle into the Dáil, the political landscape of the next five years is beginning to come into focus.

Survival of the richest: As Brazil’s COVID death toll mounts, its president celebrates his own recovery.

Brazil has been devastated by over 2 million Coronavirus cases and more than 90,000 deaths, second only to the United States. In spite of these alarming figures the country’s far right president Jair Bolsonaro has regularly dismissed the severity of the disease, calling it a “little flu”, and boasting that his athletic background would save him from becoming seriously ill should he contract the virus. Bolsonaro was later held to this claim on 7 July when the president tested positive for COVID-19.

Honk Kong’s New Security Law

When Britain returned the former colony to China in 1997, it marked the beginning of Beijing’s attempts to re-integrate Hong Kong. The introduction of a new national security law signifies a more forceful and legally binding step in the removal of Hong Kong’s independence and autonomy.

The Forgotten Generation: The Children of Yemen

The largest humanitarian crisis in the world is occurring in Yemen right now, and the world is still glossing over it. Five years of war, pitting the internationally-recognised government backed by a Saudi-led coalition against the Iran-aligned Houthi rebels – and civilians are the ones who continue to bear the brunt of the conflict.

The West Bank Annexation

On May 5 2020, Benjamin Netanyahu was sworn in for his fifth term as Prime Minister of Israel. Among his campaign pledges was the proposed annexation of the West Bank. This annexation poses a serious threat to the long-sought two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The West Bank, and more specifically the Jordan Valley, is considered pivotal to the survival of a future Palestinian state among Palestinians.

New Government, Old Tricks: Women In Irish Politics

The 33rd Dáil saw Fianna Fáil leader Micheál Martin elected as Taoiseach in the midst of a coalition of Fianna Fáil, Fianna Gael and the Greens. However, despite the historic nature of the abandonment of Civil War politics, that age-old discrepancy in the representation of women in politics continues: out of a Cabinet of sixteen, only four female Ministers have been appointed.

Share This

Share this post with your friends!